Wuthering Heights received some pretty harsh reviews at the time of its publication. Here are a few examples:
“We rise from the perusal of Wuthering Heights as if we had come fresh from a pest-house. Read Jane Eyre is our advice, but burn Wuthering Heights…”
– Paterson’s Magazine (USA), March 1848 (via The Reader’s Guide to Wuthering Heights)“How a human being could have attempted such a book as the present without committing suicide before he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery. “
– Graham’s Lady’s Magazine (USA), July 1848 (via The Reader’s Guide to Wuthering Heights)“”Wuthering Heights is a strange, inartistic story. There are evidences in every chapter of a sort of rugged power–an unconscious strength–which the possessor seems never to think of turning to the best advantage. The general effect is inexpressibly painful.”
– Atlas, 1848 (via Lilia Melani’s “The 19th Century English Novel“)
Now compare that with selection from Alice Hoffman’s introduction to the 2004 Signet Classics edition of Wuthering Heights:
“Wuthering Heights is one of the greatest novels of all time, and arguably the greatest psychological novel ever written… The ultimate rebel’s treatise written by a woman who rarely ventured farther than her own village and whose own life was tragically short, Wuthering Heights is a domestic drama, a ghost story, a romance, a spiritual journey, a diary of dreams and visions, and above all else, an examination of the nature of humanity.”
What changes in attitude between mid-19th century and now may have revised public and critical opinion of the book? Was the book’s contemporary criticism justified in any way?